Control-flow Enforcement: Indirect Branch Tracking
From: | Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu-AT-intel.com> | |
To: | x86-AT-kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-AT-zytor.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx-AT-linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-redhat.com>, linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-doc-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-mm-AT-kvack.org, linux-arch-AT-vger.kernel.org, linux-api-AT-vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd-AT-arndb.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto-AT-kernel.org>, Balbir Singh <bsingharora-AT-gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp-AT-alien8.de>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-AT-gmail.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen-AT-linux.intel.com>, Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr-AT-redhat.com>, Florian Weimer <fweimer-AT-redhat.com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools-AT-gmail.com>, Jann Horn <jannh-AT-google.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet-AT-lwn.net>, Kees Cook <keescook-AT-chromium.org>, Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz-AT-oracle.com>, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit-AT-gmail.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg-AT-redhat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel-AT-ucw.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz-AT-infradead.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap-AT-infradead.org>, "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar-AT-intel.com>, Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue-AT-intel.com>, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin-AT-arm.com>, x86-patch-review-AT-intel.com | |
Subject: | [RFC PATCH v9 0/7] Control-flow Enforcement: Indirect Branch Tracking | |
Date: | Wed, 5 Feb 2020 10:23:01 -0800 | |
Message-ID: | <20200205182308.4028-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> | |
Cc: | Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu-AT-intel.com> | |
Archive-link: | Article |
Control-flow Enforcement (CET) is a new Intel processor feature that blocks return/jump-oriented programming attacks. Details can be found in "Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual" [1]. This is the second half of CET and enables Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT). Changes from v8: - Remove a patch that adds the legacy bitmap size to memory accounting, since the bitmap is now dynamically allocated. - Change the legacy bitmap from a pre-defined address to get_unmapped_area(). - Fix mis-handling of WAIT_ENDBR in signals - Split out PTRACE, VDSO, opcode map, and Makefile changes and submit separately. [1] Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual: https://software.intel.com/en-us/download/intel-64-and-ia... architectures-sdm-combined-volumes-1-2a-2b-2c-2d-3a-3b-3c-3d-and-4 [2] CET patches v8: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190813205225.12032-1-yu-cheng... https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190813205359.12196-1-yu-cheng... H.J. Lu (1): x86/cet/ibt: Add arch_prctl functions for Indirect Branch Tracking Yu-cheng Yu (6): x86/cet/ibt: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Indirect Branch Tracking x86/cet/ibt: User-mode Indirect Branch Tracking support x86/cet/ibt: Handle signals for Indirect Branch Tracking x86/cet/ibt: ELF header parsing for Indirect Branch Tracking mm: Update alloc_set_pte() for zero page x86/cet/ibt: Introduce arch_prctl(ARCH_X86_CET_MARK_LEGACY_CODE) arch/x86/Kconfig | 17 ++ arch/x86/Makefile | 7 + arch/x86/include/asm/cet.h | 7 + arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 8 +- arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/prctl.h | 3 + arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cet.c | 58 ++++- arch/x86/kernel/cet_bitmap.c | 226 ++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/cet_prctl.c | 19 ++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 17 ++ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/signal.c | 8 +- arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 5 + mm/memory.c | 8 + .../arch/x86/include/asm/disabled-features.h | 8 +- 14 files changed, 385 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cet_bitmap.c -- 2.21.0