Debian votes on init systems
Debian votes on init systems
Posted Dec 7, 2019 6:24 UTC (Sat) by mgb (guest, #3226)In reply to: Debian votes on init systems by mjg59
Parent article: Debian votes on init systems
We use various compilers and library implementations and operating systems to make sure our code is portable.
Nobody codes to systemd - it's a moving target that nobody but RedHat can ever hope to keep up with and to do so would be to throw away 98%+ of our potential user base.
Posted Dec 7, 2019 6:54 UTC (Sat)
by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
[Link] (5 responses)
Posted Dec 7, 2019 7:25 UTC (Sat)
by mgb (guest, #3226)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Dec 7, 2019 7:41 UTC (Sat)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
Posted Dec 7, 2019 7:45 UTC (Sat)
by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
[Link]
Posted Dec 9, 2019 19:49 UTC (Mon)
by ovitters (guest, #27950)
[Link] (1 responses)
In any case, there's loads of very specific software that's critical. For any (most?) big companies (especially the ones that have been around for a while) it's often the same: Loads of systems, loads of interdependencies, etc. Enough stuff that is entirely Windows specific, plus various Linux specific, plus various systemd-specific, etc. You could go on forever basically. It's messy, everyone knows it should be better, but hey, big company..
Posted Dec 9, 2019 19:53 UTC (Mon)
by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784)
[Link]
Debian votes on init systems
Debian votes on init systems
Debian votes on init systems
Debian votes on init systems
Debian votes on init systems
Debian votes on init systems