|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Seeking consensus on dh

Seeking consensus on dh

Posted Jun 6, 2019 10:06 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: Seeking consensus on dh by epa
Parent article: Seeking consensus on dh

Sure you could, but given the impedance mismatch (RPM specs include some things Debian's don't, and vice versa; embedded scripts contain Redhat/RPM-isms, etc.) it'd make more sense to build a debian/ subdirectory from it.

The other way would be to process the RPM spec with, well, RPM, and the re-package the resulting RPM binary package to a .deb archive. This is reasonably simple to do, and flexible enough when you allow the user to edit the intermediate result.

I leave the question of whether getting RPM to run on Debian systems would be easier than writing a spec converter to whoever tries both and compares the effort involved. ;-)


to post comments

Seeking consensus on dh

Posted Jun 6, 2019 13:10 UTC (Thu) by epa (subscriber, #39769) [Link]

RPM has been packaged as part of Debian since time immemorial, but as we know that's not really the point.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds