|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Rethinking race-free process signaling

Rethinking race-free process signaling

Posted Apr 4, 2019 22:33 UTC (Thu) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
Parent article: Rethinking race-free process signaling

I've seen software using bitmasks for processes. 4 million processes is just 512kb, bumping this by 1024 times might cause issues.


to post comments

Rethinking race-free process signaling

Posted Apr 4, 2019 22:52 UTC (Thu) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link] (1 responses)

Aren't they already broken on systems with a raised sysctl setting?

Rethinking race-free process signaling

Posted Apr 4, 2019 22:57 UTC (Thu) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link]

No, they read the sysctl setting. They probably can be broken if it changes when the program is launched, but nobody really does that.

I'm not saying that such a design is a good idea, it's just that I've seen it used.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds