Static site generators
Static site generators
Posted Mar 15, 2019 22:29 UTC (Fri) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: Federated blogging with WriteFreely by me@jasonclinton.com
Parent article: Federated blogging with WriteFreely
I've not looked at static site generators, probably should. Can you name the one you're using?
The lack of comments leaves me rather less than upset in general...the last think I need is another comment area to manage!
Posted Mar 15, 2019 22:35 UTC (Fri)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
Posted Mar 15, 2019 22:42 UTC (Fri)
by andrewsh (subscriber, #71043)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Mar 16, 2019 11:05 UTC (Sat)
by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
[Link] (2 responses)
Some of the static-site systems even have a Web editor, which sounds strange but happens to be quite convenient.
Posted Mar 16, 2019 17:24 UTC (Sat)
by edgewood (subscriber, #1123)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Mar 15, 2019 22:43 UTC (Fri)
by me@jasonclinton.com (subscriber, #52701)
[Link]
Posted Mar 16, 2019 0:31 UTC (Sat)
by ay (guest, #79347)
[Link] (3 responses)
A static site generator makes a lot of sense to me since it's easy to host (even for free) and nothing of value is lost versus a CMS type system.
Posted Mar 22, 2019 23:08 UTC (Fri)
by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Mar 25, 2019 14:41 UTC (Mon)
by downey (subscriber, #117086)
[Link] (1 responses)
Specifically, embedding comments via this method: https://meta.discourse.org/t/embedding-discourse-comments...
Posted Mar 25, 2019 20:26 UTC (Mon)
by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989)
[Link]
Disqus is just a comments-only plug-in => https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disqus
Posted Mar 16, 2019 1:01 UTC (Sat)
by michaelkjohnson (subscriber, #41438)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Mar 26, 2019 12:11 UTC (Tue)
by arnout (subscriber, #94240)
[Link] (1 responses)
You can just use the online editor of gitlab, which also allows you to preview md files.
Posted Mar 26, 2019 22:37 UTC (Tue)
by michaelkjohnson (subscriber, #41438)
[Link]
Thank you, I had totally not considered that. It would have been simpler. Very good thought.
Posted Mar 16, 2019 2:38 UTC (Sat)
by zlynx (guest, #2285)
[Link]
That takes the same amount of time as generating a dynamic page and can be reused by every visitor until a new comment is added.
Posted Mar 16, 2019 8:37 UTC (Sat)
by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935)
[Link]
A couple years ago I wrote a tutorial at https://opensource.com/article/17/4/getting-started-jekyll based on my experience building qemu.org.
Posted Mar 23, 2019 20:08 UTC (Sat)
by spwhitton (subscriber, #71678)
[Link]
Static site generators
Static site generators
Static site generators
Any you could recommend? I support the web site of an organization I'm involved with, and they went with WordPress a few years ago to allow it to be updated by nontechnical users. I think I've finally got it locked down mostly satisfactorily, but it would be nice to test a more secure but still friendly alternative.
Static site generators
Static site generators
Static site generators
Static site generators
Which is ubiquitous, but you sort of don't know where they're kept and whose getting up to what with them, and that could be irksome.
Static site generators
Static site generators
I recently moved to using jekyll as the static site generator for my blog — I just git commit and push, and shortly thereafter it's updated. I like being able to track my blog history in Git. I've been thinking about running Git on my android phone to push blog entries when I'm away from my computer, but somehow it doesn't seem sufficiently important. ☺
Jekyll as a static site generator for blogging
Jekyll as a static site generator for blogging
Jekyll as a static site generator for blogging
Static site generators
Static site generators
Static site generators
