C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
Posted Nov 14, 2018 12:42 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof by drag
Parent article: C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
It is clearly not unreliable for many people, given that glibc upstream has been talking about replacing nss with nscd by default for some time now.
I think you need to investigate more....
Posted Nov 14, 2018 12:53 UTC (Wed)
by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
[Link] (6 responses)
Today? no problem IMHO, and it does speed things up (a lot, for some installations).
Posted Nov 14, 2018 15:25 UTC (Wed)
by zdzichu (subscriber, #17118)
[Link] (3 responses)
Except when it doesn't work, which is a daily occurrence: When allocating a dynamic user, a lookup is done in systemd, which fails (because the user doesnt exist, and systemd is going to allocate a dynamic uid for it) but then that answer is cached and after the dynamic user is set up, nscd will still say the user isn't created.
Posted Nov 14, 2018 16:40 UTC (Wed)
by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106)
[Link]
Posted Nov 14, 2018 19:01 UTC (Wed)
by quotemstr (subscriber, #45331)
[Link]
Posted Nov 15, 2018 16:05 UTC (Thu)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Posted Nov 14, 2018 17:05 UTC (Wed)
by drag (guest, #31333)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Nov 15, 2018 16:07 UTC (Thu)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof