C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
Posted Nov 13, 2018 16:26 UTC (Tue) by pm215 (subscriber, #98099)In reply to: C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof by pctammela
Parent article: C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
Posted Nov 13, 2018 19:47 UTC (Tue)
by mirabilos (subscriber, #84359)
[Link] (4 responses)
We don’t even separate kernel and libc in thinking. Commits are done across the entire source tree, oftentimes touching both in the same commit.
Posted Nov 14, 2018 12:40 UTC (Wed)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Nov 14, 2018 22:25 UTC (Wed)
by kmeyer (subscriber, #50720)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Nov 14, 2018 23:25 UTC (Wed)
by mirabilos (subscriber, #84359)
[Link]
A bit more seriously, FreeBSD “feels” like trying to imitate what GNU/Linux does, just a bit behind the times and selectively. They also do a lot of rewrites (one could say NIH) and are very removed from the other BSDs (even the two active forks of it), code-wise.
Posted Nov 15, 2018 16:02 UTC (Thu)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof
C library system-call wrappers, or the lack thereof