Thanks
Thanks
Posted Mar 24, 2004 8:54 UTC (Wed) by vondo (guest, #256)Parent article: The Grumpy Editor's Guide to Image Viewers
I just wanted to say "thanks" for this series of articles. Often we all carp about how you missed this or that, etc. But they are really useful as one of the hardest things about Free software (and Unix in general) is *finding* the great software that's out there.
Unix rant for the day: Why is it that in the 1980's VMS had a *fantastic* help system and we are still stuck using man and the very un-intuitive to use "info?" They both royally suck compared to something that existed 20 or more years ago.
Posted Mar 24, 2004 12:26 UTC (Wed)
by evgeny (subscriber, #774)
[Link] (7 responses)
The amount of comments these articles provoke (concurring only with the hottest SCO reviews ;-)) say for themselves. > Why is it that in the 1980's VMS had a *fantastic* help system and we are I agree that "info" the application sucks. But info the format is ok. I suggest you try alternative viewers. E.g. tkinfo, minfo (Motif-based) and pinfo (curses). All support mouse clicks; the latter displays man pages, too.
Posted Mar 24, 2004 14:39 UTC (Wed)
by diegor (subscriber, #1967)
[Link]
- hypertext, and not only a *pure* gerarchy of menu. Even with man you can search for a string inside the man page, but not with
Posted Mar 24, 2004 18:42 UTC (Wed)
by vondo (guest, #256)
[Link] (4 responses)
Optimal would be a CGI or PHP based program that would dynamically translate 'info' into HTML. Any such product like that out there?
Posted Mar 24, 2004 19:41 UTC (Wed)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
(It's good enough for GNU's on-line manual pages...) Admittedly, you can't search multi-node HTML documents without external tools (which makes me wonder why anyone bothers with it as a primary documentation format.)
Posted Mar 24, 2004 20:59 UTC (Wed)
by dswegen (guest, #4431)
[Link]
Posted Mar 25, 2004 4:08 UTC (Thu)
by rfunk (subscriber, #4054)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Apr 1, 2004 18:59 UTC (Thu)
by mikachu (guest, #5333)
[Link]
Posted Mar 25, 2004 3:46 UTC (Thu)
by iabervon (subscriber, #722)
[Link]
I second this. "The Grumpy Editor's" series is alone worth the subscription price. I believe it deserves its own top-level header/link alongside with "Archives/Kernel/ etc". Also, a few other LWN articles (including contributed ones - like the recent about CVS & friends) concentrating on _comparison_ of similar products belong to the same "gold" stuff.Thanks: me too
> still stuck using man and the very un-intuitive to use "info?" They both
> royally suck compared to something that existed 20 or more years ago.
IMHO Vms help sucks... Yes, it had a nice interface, but usally you can't find more than a very terse list of option. Info, even if had a less intuitive interface have the following enancehment:Thanks: me too
- you can search for string through the whole manual
- you can print the manual
- you can scroll
vms help. Of course I'm comparing help on command line...
Thanks, I'll look into one of those next time I find myself consulting 'info'Thanks: me too
Er, makeinfo --html?texinfo in HTML is trivial
info2www is a CGI program that does exactly that. Pretty reasonable it is too...
Thanks: me too
If you use Konqueror you can get to info pages with a URL like
info:/gzip.
Info
this works in galeon (and probably epiphany) too
Info
My feeling is that "info" is a fine format, and the viewer in emacs is a Thanks: me too
fine viewer (the standalone program manages to be terrible, despite being
barely different from the emacs one). The main problem is that there
isn't a standard organization of the information in the file, and all of
the examples I've seen are very hard to use for reference. (For example,
by looking at the info node for "ls", try to figure out what -F does,
what the default colors are, and how to get other colors; I had to go to
a pre-info man page to find out some of this, since the current man pages
have removed all of the information that isn't in the info nodes).
