The kernel's code of conduct, one week later
The kernel's code of conduct, one week later
Posted Oct 2, 2018 23:14 UTC (Tue) by johannbg (guest, #65743)In reply to: The kernel's code of conduct, one week later by marcH
Parent article: The kernel's code of conduct, one week later
If we use bug trackers as an example you need a single bug tracker as an origin and that bug tracker can have as many other bug trackers as can be imagine for as long as those bug trackers perform bi-directional communication amongst themselves to maintain that origin.
For example if an report is created in bug tracker at point of origin it will also be created at all or just the relevant sub-community bug tracker instance ( depending how this is setup ), any creation, state change,comment etc from the bug tracker at sub-community will also create,update etc report at the origin ( or pull/push model like used in dvs could be used ) .
The above is not fragmentation.
Fragmentation occures when there exist no bi-directional communication between bug trackers so if an report is created at origin the reporter is directed somewhere else to another bug tracker to create report there.
In addition to that, fragmentation exist in most peoples perception of time ( often used as false justification for having seperated instances from the origin, like seperated bug trackers ), in which it manifests itself by people putting more value on their time compared to others ( often via roles like developer vs reporter or doctor vs nurse etc which creates even further fragmentation and inevitable conflict ) when in fact we ( as in the entire human race ) are bound by the same amount of time, defined by the average lifespan of an human being.
Posted Oct 4, 2018 3:43 UTC (Thu)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (3 responses)
- I can hardly see any value anyway in a unique bug tracker for the kernel - which again is a huge collection of many different projects. Why would the developers of some wifi driver care about bugs in some other random audio driver? Why would have to constantly filter out noise from other components? Why would they have to restrict themselves to a common and minimal schema? Why would they have to deal with the significantly higher administration complexity, work and permissions?
Posted Oct 4, 2018 6:09 UTC (Thu)
by johannbg (guest, #65743)
[Link] (2 responses)
I have seen unimaginable horror in this regard so much horror that I propably should make freedesktop.org my next draining the type ocean project and contribute to it's migration/restoration ( that is if it will ever get over it's identity crisis ) ;)
Anyway I understand the pain you are getting at but what you describe here is failure of the tool and or those that are administrating it, which is the cause of the fragmentation so simply switch out bugzilla for something better. . .
Posted Oct 4, 2018 7:03 UTC (Thu)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (1 responses)
The tracker software certainly plays a role but not the most important role in my experience. How you configure and use it matters much more. it's a bit like programming languages: you can write bad code in any of them. It's just easier with some.
Posted Oct 4, 2018 7:27 UTC (Thu)
by johannbg (guest, #65743)
[Link]
bug tracker fragmentation
bug tracker fragmentation
bug tracker fragmentation
bug tracker fragmentation