After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside (The New Yorker)
After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside (The New Yorker)
Posted Sep 20, 2018 13:56 UTC (Thu) by niner (subscriber, #26151)In reply to: After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside (The New Yorker) by jkingweb
Parent article: After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside (The New Yorker)
The poll can still be found here:
https://twitter.com/antirez/status/1038094104129937408
So, no, based on this evidence, my conclusion is that Redis was _not_ in fact forced to remove those words. The team chose to do so.
Posted Sep 20, 2018 16:33 UTC (Thu)
by jrigg (guest, #30848)
[Link] (2 responses)
I got the distinct impression that it was a reluctant decision. There was some bad behaviour before that poll from the person who claimed the words were offensive:
Accusing a person of being a fascist (when that person's family had previously been persecuted by fascists) is not very pleasant.
Posted Sep 20, 2018 16:54 UTC (Thu)
by niner (subscriber, #26151)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Sep 20, 2018 17:27 UTC (Thu)
by jrigg (guest, #30848)
[Link]
After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside (The New Yorker)
http://antirez.com/news/122
After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside (The New Yorker)
After Years of Abusive E-mails, the Creator of Linux Steps Aside (The New Yorker)
It is possible to be forced by public opinion. Why do these discussions always seem to become confrontational?