Flash storage endurance
Flash storage endurance
Posted Jun 8, 2018 18:20 UTC (Fri) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)In reply to: Flash storage endurance by excors
Parent article: Flash storage topics
Basic benchmark design problem, not specific to storage or endurance.
> and you need to know what memory chip it uses
Not a problem specific to storage or endurance: https://www.google.com/search?q=iphone+intel+modem
> CPU/GPU benchmarks are much easier since the relevant software is provided by the benchmark itself
Interfaces to GPU are orders of magnitude more complex than storage interfaces; one of the reasons cheating GPU benchmarks is universal: https://www.google.com/search?q=game+benchmark+cheating
https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/apitrace/
Yet no one suggests to stop benchmarking GPUs.
> The problem isn't necessarily that people would cheat, it's that the marketing people would tell the engineers to spend effort legitimately...
We know how "legitimately" often ends up with (at least) GPUs and car emissions. You can take for granted that some actors will always go "beyond legitimate"; again nothing specific to flash storage or endurance.
> I guess you'd need access to automatically-uploaded error logs or customer support records to see how many users have encountered storage errors. That would be nice, but seems unlikely to happen.
How do we know it's not happening already? (biggest lie on the Internet: "I agree")
Posted Jun 8, 2018 18:44 UTC (Fri)
by excors (subscriber, #95769)
[Link]
Error logs certainly get uploaded already, on some devices - they're very useful for identifying and prioritising common bugs, quickly detecting regressions when rolling out OTAs, etc. What I mean is unlikely is that the companies with that information would ever release it publicly.
Flash storage endurance
>
> How do we know it's not happening already? (biggest lie on the Internet: "I agree")