The strange story of the ARM Meltdown-fix backport
The strange story of the ARM Meltdown-fix backport
Posted Mar 16, 2018 2:09 UTC (Fri) by atelszewski (guest, #111673)In reply to: The strange story of the ARM Meltdown-fix backport by flussence
Parent article: The strange story of the ARM Meltdown-fix backport
> It's bewildering to think ARM still exists
Remember that Arm isn't only the big and complex SoCs.
It's a big player in the microcontrollers area.
And as much as I hate what they do in Linux ecosystem, I enjoy working with Cortex-M{0,3} cores.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Telszewski
Posted Mar 16, 2018 2:57 UTC (Fri)
by pizza (subscriber, #46)
[Link]
Over time Arm has provided more and more building blocks, including reference designs, and have increasingly encouraged more standardization in how things are put together (The Cortex-M's CMSIS framework is a good example, along with the SBSA stuff for the ARMv8 servers) but it's still ultimately up to the licensee to put together and support an appropriate CSP/BSP. Because the many licensees typically end up differentiating themselves into corners, things tend to fall apart rapidly, resulting in the current less-than-ideal situation.
The strange story of the ARM Meltdown-fix backport
