Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
FREE SAS, a French telecom operator, known as the owner of the free.fr website"). It is possible that Free Electrons may lose access to its "free-electrons.com" domain name as part of the dispute, so links to the many resources that Free Electrons hosts (including documentation and conference videos) should be updated to use "bootlin.com". "
The services we offer are different, we target a different audience (professionals instead of individuals), and most of our communication efforts are in English, to reach an international audience. Therefore Michael Opdenacker and Free Electrons’ management believe that there is no risk of confusion between Free Electrons and FREE SAS. However, FREE SAS has filed in excess of 100 oppositions and District Court actions against trademarks or name containing “free”. In view of the resources needed to fight this case, Free Electrons has decided to change name without waiting for the decision of the District Court. This will allow us to stay focused on our projects rather than exhausting ourselves fighting a long legal battle."
Posted Feb 2, 2018 18:25 UTC (Fri)
by salimma (subscriber, #34460)
[Link] (1 responses)
Perhaps the free.fr people might want to sue FreeBSD next?
Posted Feb 2, 2018 22:05 UTC (Fri)
by bradfitz (subscriber, #4378)
[Link]
Posted Feb 2, 2018 18:29 UTC (Fri)
by Herve5 (subscriber, #115399)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Feb 2, 2018 18:58 UTC (Fri)
by willy (subscriber, #9762)
[Link]
Posted Feb 3, 2018 1:22 UTC (Sat)
by k8to (guest, #15413)
[Link]
The later indictment for misuse of company assets seems significantly more telling, to me.
Posted Feb 2, 2018 20:22 UTC (Fri)
by opalmirror (subscriber, #23465)
[Link] (5 responses)
Posted Feb 5, 2018 4:41 UTC (Mon)
by immibis (subscriber, #105511)
[Link] (4 responses)
But regardless of what courts would think, they've already won, Free Electrons hasn't even bothered to defend themselves, they've just voluntarily given away their lunch money to the first person who asked.
Posted Feb 9, 2018 16:30 UTC (Fri)
by JanC_ (guest, #34940)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Feb 10, 2018 1:35 UTC (Sat)
by immibis (subscriber, #105511)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Feb 10, 2018 8:34 UTC (Sat)
by JanC_ (guest, #34940)
[Link] (1 responses)
E.g. Microsoft sued (or threatened to sue) companies & projects for using the word "Windows" in their name:
And of course they also did the same with MikeRoweSoft (which was actually owned by a Canadian high school student named Mike Rowe), etc.
Posted Jun 17, 2019 20:35 UTC (Mon)
by samiam95124 (guest, #120873)
[Link]
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2002/02/can-you-trade...
Posted Feb 3, 2018 1:41 UTC (Sat)
by ccchips (subscriber, #3222)
[Link]
Posted Feb 3, 2018 2:56 UTC (Sat)
by hadess (subscriber, #24252)
[Link]
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/bootlin/allwinner-vp...
Posted Feb 3, 2018 11:46 UTC (Sat)
by rsidd (subscriber, #2582)
[Link] (19 responses)
Maybe literally true but a bit misleading, free.fr has existed since 2000 at least. I know because I used their "free" internet service then -- a modem-based thing that was not free in terms of phone bills! And though I haven't lived in France since 2002, I still have a free.fr personal webpage that apparently they are willing to host in perpetuity.
Disappointing to see this litigation from them. "Free" is a widely used and understood word in France, probably more so than "libre" in the US. To claim a trademark on any possible use of that word is absurd.
Posted Feb 3, 2018 18:41 UTC (Sat)
by ballombe (subscriber, #9523)
[Link] (18 responses)
Posted Feb 5, 2018 11:46 UTC (Mon)
by Landswellsong (guest, #122391)
[Link] (17 responses)
I reaaaaally doubt I can call free.fr an advanced tech company from what I've seen.
Posted Feb 5, 2018 11:51 UTC (Mon)
by comio (subscriber, #115526)
[Link]
Posted Feb 5, 2018 18:05 UTC (Mon)
by wazoox (subscriber, #69624)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Feb 6, 2018 9:46 UTC (Tue)
by jem (subscriber, #24231)
[Link] (2 responses)
My ISP provides me with 4.7·1021 static IP addresses.
Posted Feb 9, 2018 14:47 UTC (Fri)
by Nico57 (subscriber, #63763)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 9, 2018 17:50 UTC (Fri)
by jem (subscriber, #24231)
[Link]
IPv6 is quite usable for a home server for private use; a static, public IPv4 is not so important for that anymore.
Posted Feb 6, 2018 9:08 UTC (Tue)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (10 responses)
They were in 2007 one of the very first "consumer" telcos world-wide to deploy IPv6 on a massive scale. DVR at no extra cost with remote programming. One of the first telco to offer cheap international phone calls (call cards aside). Standard SIP-based VoIP. Wifi hotspots. File server. Print server. DECT. Femto cell. PLC Remote administration. Etc., etc.
So yes: maybe not any more but they've been the most innovative ISP for a decade or two and they have been copied by everyone else. Another "innovation" was never charging any extra for these features - the exact opposite of all other telcos worldwide, for which the company founder developed hatred while he was working for them; his own words.
Now an interesting licensing trick: the box is rented and not sold; so they don't have to release GPL modifications.
Later they also cut the price of mobile in half and forced the competition to align. Their most expensive offer with all bells and whistles is 16 euros/month. I think about it every time I pay my "cheap" T-mobile bill which is 3 times more.
Posted Feb 6, 2018 16:43 UTC (Tue)
by rsidd (subscriber, #2582)
[Link] (6 responses)
Implying that others are more expensive? Impressive. Here in India I pay INR 199 (a bit over 2 euros) a month for 1GB/day data, and unlimited calls and SMS within India. Last year I paid about 40 euros for a 10 day roaming package in Europe that included 5GB data, 100 mins free outgoing calls (India+local), and unlimited incoming calls and SMS. Way more than I actually used. Given my usage patterns this suggests that, when in other countries no matter for how long, I should not purchase local SIMs and should just use roaming plans?
Posted Feb 6, 2018 16:56 UTC (Tue)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (5 responses)
I compared countries with comparable wages and cost of living, you're not.
> I should not purchase local SIMs and should just use roaming plans?
Roaming has become less and less of a rip-off in the recent years, either because of (European, other?) regulations of just competition. Free.fr offers 30 days roaming per year for free.
Posted Feb 18, 2018 10:49 UTC (Sun)
by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Feb 18, 2018 16:36 UTC (Sun)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (3 responses)
How is the mobile infrastructure more advanced?
Posted Feb 22, 2018 9:38 UTC (Thu)
by jezuch (subscriber, #52988)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Feb 22, 2018 15:21 UTC (Thu)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 27, 2018 14:43 UTC (Tue)
by jezuch (subscriber, #52988)
[Link]
Posted Feb 6, 2018 20:17 UTC (Tue)
by lsl (subscriber, #86508)
[Link] (1 responses)
This "trick" seems dubious. How is renting out something not distribution in the sense of copyright law?
Posted Feb 8, 2018 10:50 UTC (Thu)
by kpfleming (subscriber, #23250)
[Link]
This argument can be extended to cloud virtual machines as well, although it gets harder to support in that situation since claiming that you 'own and control' an ephemeral virtual machine running on a computer owned and operated by RackSpace/Amazon/Google/Microsoft/etc. is really a stretch. Of course it's quite unlikely that any of those cloud providers, or the datacenter operators, would ever demand a copy of the source code, because doing so would materially affect their future business in a very negative way.
Posted Feb 10, 2018 13:13 UTC (Sat)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link]
I love the BT Broadband adverts for SIM-only mobile ... "Save hundreds of pounds if you take our most expensive offer" ...
If you buy 5 sim-only contracts for your family, they cost you £10/sim/month. I pay less than £10 for two sims together, which provide way more texts/calls/data than my wife and I ever use ...
Define "cheap". It's not cheap if you're paying extra for stuff you never use, no matter how you phrase it. We'd probably be better off on pay-as-you-go, but the contract is cheap and convenient, so we pay that little bit extra to know that the phone will always be there whenever we want it.
Cheers,
Posted Feb 6, 2018 16:15 UTC (Tue)
by ballombe (subscriber, #9523)
[Link]
What's with trademarks lawsuits these days?
What's with trademarks lawsuits these days?
Please accept the apologies of a Frenchman
With this kind of personal history one cannot be surprised by his company's general behavior...
Please accept the apologies of a Frenchman
Please accept the apologies of a Frenchman
Legal ownership of Free seems somehow both ludicrous and dismaying. Especially in this day of corporate sponsored stadiums and the like.
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwindows
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WxWidgets
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
But free.fr provides you with a free, static IPv4 address :)
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Heh. Ok, but the /56 prefix is static.Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Linux and VLC based. Most channels streamable to any PC.
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
Wol
Free Electrons becomes Bootlin
(and yes free.fr provides IPv6)
