Point releases for the GNU C Library

> Lots of automated is still zero of human effort.
"You've got a nice lot of unaudited test output over here. It would be a real shame if the results you received somehow weren't the results you were expecting."

Tests nobody audits, in this case stuff taking zero human effort, aren't providing information to that question of "should I trust this software, and with what tasks?" They may be out of scope for the contemporary functionality, badly configured so irrelevant, or simply not yielding any or any meaningful output.

It's never zero human effort. An unchecked result isn't worth the time it took to run the tests. It's less effort than doing it all by hand, and can even be set up so that a clean run is trivial to confirm and a failing run includes clear diagnostic information about what broke, how and why, but it's literally never zero work.

We really are that short on community person-power that I'm writing this and not some tests. (Of this, I'm a bit ashamed.)

K3n.