About calculators in general

Posted Oct 6, 2017 7:06 UTC (Fri) by madhatter (subscriber, #4665)
In reply to: About calculators in general by smitty_one_each
Parent article: The NumWorks graphing calculator

Traction getting be to seem not does but, for asked been has It: https://github.com/numworks/epsilon/issues/35

Excuse me; I meant it has been asked for, but does not seem to be getting traction (sorry, that was childish of me).

About calculators in general

Posted Oct 6, 2017 9:46 UTC (Fri) by smitty_one_each (subscriber, #28989) [Link]

I saw what you did there immediately.

About calculators in general

Posted Oct 6, 2017 15:25 UTC (Fri) by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106) [Link]

Did you mean:

> it asked-for has-been it traction getting seems not but

Just reversing the order of the terms does not change an infix expression to RPN. However, if you diagram the sentence and then write out the resulting tree in postfix order you should get something approximating "RPN English". (Complicated, of course, by implied/missing clauses, conjugation, and tenses. No doubt a specialist in English grammar could produce a more precise translation.)