|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Content-Type: text/markdown

Content-Type: text/markdown

Posted Aug 11, 2017 21:35 UTC (Fri) by derobert (subscriber, #89569)
In reply to: Content-Type: text/markdown by jani
Parent article: The coming WebKitGTK+ 2.4 apocalypse

FYI: x-prefixes are now generally considered to have been a mistake, or at least an idea that didn't work out. See BCP 178. Appendix B gives rationale, but in short there are better ways to generate private names, and anything that is intended to be interoperable winds up having to keep the X- name forever to avoid a flag day. So you wind up with the X- name de-facto (or actually) standardized anyway, defeating the purpose.


to post comments

Content-Type: text/markdown

Posted Aug 11, 2017 22:00 UTC (Fri) by jani (subscriber, #74547) [Link]

Thanks. Makes sense.

Content-Type: text/markdown

Posted Aug 13, 2017 4:31 UTC (Sun) by roc (subscriber, #30627) [Link]

This matches what we learned about vendor prefixes in Web APIs.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds