|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Reconsidering the scheduler's wake_wide() heuristic

Reconsidering the scheduler's wake_wide() heuristic

Posted Jul 29, 2017 9:31 UTC (Sat) by garloff (subscriber, #319)
In reply to: Reconsidering the scheduler's wake_wide() heuristic by ejr
Parent article: Reconsidering the scheduler's wake_wide() heuristic

So, it indeed seems that an application should tell the kernel how hard it should try to place communicating processes close to each other. Probably should not be binary, but allow for different steps.
Question is whether this can be done efficiently at process group scope or whether it needs to be system-wide. Maybe Cgroup-wide?


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds