| From: |
| "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones-AT-redhat.com> |
| To: |
| Development discussions related to Fedora <devel-AT-lists.fedoraproject.org> |
| Subject: |
| Re: F27 System Wide Change: Graphical Applications as Flatpaks |
| Date: |
| Fri, 14 Jul 2017 09:44:18 +0100 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20170714084418.GO17340@redhat.com> |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
> packaging.
At least we see where this is going.
If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
