|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Apache disallows the Facebook BSD+patent license

Apache disallows the Facebook BSD+patent license

Posted Jul 19, 2017 15:15 UTC (Wed) by juliank (guest, #45896)
In reply to: Apache disallows the Facebook BSD+patent license by juliank
Parent article: Apache disallows the Facebook BSD+patent license

I think cladisch explains that better below, with the reference to MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Patriarch Partners VIII, LLC .


to post comments

Apache disallows the Facebook BSD+patent license

Posted Jul 19, 2017 17:41 UTC (Wed) by jejb (subscriber, #6654) [Link] (1 responses)

> I think cladisch explains that better below, with the reference to MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Patriarch Partners VIII, LLC

I believe he thinks the reason to apply contract interpretations is the Artifex v Hancom decision. However, just because you can enforce contractual remedies under certain circumstances does not mean that a licence is interpreted exactly like a contract. The terms of a licence have universality, meaning they have to be interpreted in the same way for everyone. The only way to change this is to alter the terms. The Facebook patent grant, being an additional permission, does not alter the terms so any court decision that the BSD licence gives an implied patent grant would be binding on Facebook regardless of any evidence (or even an explicit statement) that Facebook's intention was not to grant patents except via the additional permission when they released code under the BSD licence.

The key question that governs whether the additional permission alters the terms of the licence is severability: if you receive code under BSD+FB may you re-release it as BSD only? Facebook already stated that you may.

Apache disallows the Facebook BSD+patent license

Posted Jul 20, 2017 5:55 UTC (Thu) by bernat (subscriber, #51658) [Link]

> The key question that governs whether the additional permission alters the terms of the licence is severability: if you receive code under BSD+FB may you re-release it as BSD only? Facebook already stated that you may.

You may, but you don't own any of the associated patent. So, the implicit grant people get from you through the BSD license is weaker that the implicit grant people may have got from Facebook if they kept only the BSD license.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds