|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Revisiting "too small to fail"

Revisiting "too small to fail"

Posted Jun 3, 2017 21:55 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: Revisiting "too small to fail" by Wol
Parent article: Revisiting "too small to fail"

That's not as much of a problem as I thought it was. raid6check does what's necessary (it's just, uh, not installed by default). Frankly, I'm happy to wait for the immensely rare occasion when mismatch_cnt rises above 0 on a RAID-6 array and then run raid6check on it: complete automation of events as rare as that isn't terribly important to me. (But maybe it is for others...)


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds