|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Revisiting "too small to fail"

Revisiting "too small to fail"

Posted May 20, 2017 14:01 UTC (Sat) by arjan (subscriber, #36785)
Parent article: Revisiting "too small to fail"

All the error paths also add to the code size in the binary, from that angle, a non-failing kmalloc() is actually a very nice thing, especially for the smaller side of embedded or cloud.


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds