Revisiting "too small to fail"
Revisiting "too small to fail"
Posted May 20, 2017 14:01 UTC (Sat) by arjan (subscriber, #36785)Parent article: Revisiting "too small to fail"
All the error paths also add to the code size in the binary, from that angle, a non-failing kmalloc() is actually a very nice thing, especially for the smaller side of embedded or cloud.
