A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab
A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab
Posted May 16, 2017 15:04 UTC (Tue) by halla (subscriber, #14185)In reply to: A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab by Conan_Kudo
Parent article: A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab
Huh? Turn to do what? We moved to Phabricator in 2014 or so.
Posted May 16, 2017 18:10 UTC (Tue)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted May 17, 2017 18:33 UTC (Wed)
by halla (subscriber, #14185)
[Link] (3 responses)
I like phabricator's repo browsing, task system, possibility to create mockups and stuff, project boards and dashboards. I think its search abilities are below par. We don't use it to replace bugzilla (yet), instead users report to bugzilla, and, this is for Krita alone, I triage the bugs in bugzilla, and when I want action to be taken on a bug, I add a task in phabricator. So, phab is where our todo is, bugzilla where the user reports are.
Posted May 17, 2017 19:17 UTC (Wed)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (2 responses)
Do you have details on this?
And I'm aware that one tool isn't going to fit everyone. I'm glad (but not surprised) that KDE chose a FOSS solution at least. I just didn't like Phabricator from a contributor POV when I was submitting a patch to a project using it.
Posted May 17, 2017 19:49 UTC (Wed)
by pizza (subscriber, #46)
[Link] (1 responses)
Even if true, that seems trivial to change or disable, given the full-source-code nature of gitlab...
Posted May 18, 2017 6:31 UTC (Thu)
by halla (subscriber, #14185)
[Link]
A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab
A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab
A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab
A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab
> Do you have details on this?
A proposal to move GNOME to GitLab