The new Fedora Project mission statement
Fedora creates an innovative platform that lights up hardware, clouds, and containers for software developers and community members to build tailored solutions for their users." See the full text for a description of what it means and how they arrived at it.
From: | Matthew Miller <mattdm-AT-fedoraproject.org> | |
To: | Discussions with the Fedora Council and community <council-discuss-AT-lists.fedoraproject.org> | |
Subject: | Updating the Fedora Project Mission | |
Date: | Fri, 14 Apr 2017 09:55:13 -0400 | |
Message-ID: | <20170414135513.GA14311@mattdm.org> |
Background ---------- Way back in 2003, the original Fedora Project mission statement¹ was straightforward — “to work with the Linux community to build a complete, general purpose operating system exclusively from open source software.” This has some virtue: it's clear and concrete, and it encodes the values of community and open source. But, it's also rather small; arguably this was _already done_, so, you know, “good job everyone” — backslapping ensues, nothing more needed, right? After 6½ years, the Fedora Board (the precursor to our current Fedora Council) decided it was time for a refresh, and put a lot of work into coming up with our current mission² (as well as a vision and objectives). That mission is “to lead the advancement of free and open source software and content as a collaborative community.” This has many virtues too — it's ambitious, and again keeps those key values front and center. But, it's also very broad. If we were to start a project with a clean slate today to do what the mission says, I don't think we'd even _think_ of creating a Linux distro. There are plenty of other activities that could consume an entire large pro-free-and-open-source project. When we started Fedora.next, we decided to work underneath the mission as it stood. This has worked out well enough, but we're coming up to what feels like the limit. This is clear in the "Budget.next" process — it's one thing to say that spending is to be determined in public based on clear objectives and measurable results, but for it to really work, those objectives need to be attached to a goal with a more clear scope. It's now been another 6½ years, and it’s the perfect time to revisit the mission — to look at who we are, what we do well, what we really want to do, what we say we do but actually don't, and so on. Our Thinking ------------ At our in-person activity days at the end of March, the Fedora Council did just that. We spent some time discussing those questions and worked on lists of strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities. We talked about the Fedora Foundations as well, and agreed that we do want to keep these as statements of our core values. We wanted something which would answer: * What do we do? * How do we do it? * Who do we do it for? * and, what unique value do we bring? After a long and productive working discussion, we decided to break for dinner, and come back the next morning to actually draft a new statement to bring to the community for discussion, adjustment, and approval. Brian scribbled down a quick idea in the evening, and in the morning we started bright and early at adding to, subtracting from, rewording, deconstructing, and reconstructing, until we came up with something that everyone on the Council felt good about. The New Mission Draft --------------------- So, here it is: Fedora creates an innovative platform that lights up hardware, clouds, and containers for software developers and community members to build tailored solutions for their users. Let's Break It Down ------------------- We decided to not write a new vision statement at this point. The Four Foundations³ — Freedom, Friends, Features, First — both state our core values and illustrate our overall goals and objectives. However, we do want to make sure that some of the various parts of the mission are explained. * Creates an innovative platform — at the operating system level, we don’t just integrate.We do new things. This is what makes us a platform and not just a distribution. And, “innovative” is just a buzzword. Current examples include solving the “too fast / too slow” problem with Modularity, exploring ostree for delivery and updates, and the Layered Image Build Service, where containers become a first-class part of the OS. - Lights up hardware, clouds, and containers — We want to be specific about a primary focus as an enablement layer for environments people want to use. - For software developers to build tailored solutions for their users — this includes both upstream software developers and downstream communities who want to build on what we create. - For community members to build tailored solutions for their users — Fedora isn’t just the toolkit. Many of our contributors are here to collaborate to create solutions for specific user problems, ranging from Fedora Workstation to Fedora Robotics Suite. We have lots of ways to do this within the project, from Editions to Spins and Labs to the upcoming Fedora Playground concept. The core emphasis, though, is on enabling this collaboration. Next Steps ---------- We really hope our proposed mission statement makes sense to all of you and tries to capture what we want to be for the next three to five years. We would be very interested in feedback from the community, not just in how to make the language tighter but, truly, on the goals of the project and how we can better capture the ethos of Fedora. ---- 1. http://web.archive.org/web/20031008035915/http://fedora.r... 2. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Overview#Our_Mission 3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Foundations -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ council-discuss mailing list -- council-discuss@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to council-discuss-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
Posted Apr 14, 2017 18:03 UTC (Fri)
by atai (subscriber, #10977)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Apr 14, 2017 20:00 UTC (Fri)
by louie (guest, #3285)
[Link]
Posted Apr 14, 2017 23:44 UTC (Fri)
by rgmoore (✭ supporter ✭, #75)
[Link] (2 responses)
This could be easily fixed by specifying "innovative free software platform" or "innovative FOSS platform" in the first clause.
Posted Apr 15, 2017 13:58 UTC (Sat)
by mattdm (subscriber, #18)
[Link] (1 responses)
That's why we decided we'd instead make the Fedora Foundations — of which "freedom" is the first — prominent in place of a vision statement, right next to the mission. It gives us a lot more room to illustrate what we actually mean.
I'm open to revisiting that, but that's the thinking we had. We certainly have no intention of deemphasizing software freedom as part of the overall project strategy.
Posted Apr 18, 2017 10:24 UTC (Tue)
by BeS (guest, #43108)
[Link]
I don't think it is about taking sides. Both Free Software and Open Source describes the same software. It's just about which aspects you want to highlight, is it more the technical part of the availability of source code or the social part of software freedom.
While personal I prefer to highlight the "not so technical" aspects of software freedom I wouldn't mind if Fedora would decide to highlight the "open" part. As said by others, I wouldn't go with "FOSS", "FLOSS", "free and open source",... that's all to technical and to confusing. But I would appreciate it if "Open Source" or "Free Software" would be part of the mission statement.
Posted Apr 14, 2017 18:46 UTC (Fri)
by dowdle (subscriber, #659)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Apr 15, 2017 13:44 UTC (Sat)
by mattdm (subscriber, #18)
[Link]
Posted Apr 14, 2017 21:11 UTC (Fri)
by jbowen (subscriber, #113501)
[Link] (8 responses)
Posted Apr 15, 2017 8:27 UTC (Sat)
by csamuel (✭ supporter ✭, #2624)
[Link] (7 responses)
Not personally a Fedora user, but I still care about it and I'd hope this doesn't reflect a move away from meeting the needs of those users.
Posted Apr 15, 2017 16:48 UTC (Sat)
by yodermk (subscriber, #3803)
[Link] (6 responses)
OTOH, I am also a developer/engineer/sysadmin, so I guess I appreciate the whole package Fedora offers.
Maybe the point is that for non-tech end users, Fedora simply isn't the right choice? Maybe, but I don't think there's any reason it can't work well for them.
Posted Apr 16, 2017 12:38 UTC (Sun)
by mattdm (subscriber, #18)
[Link] (5 responses)
> Fedora isn’t just the toolkit. Many of our contributors
This mission statement is not an end-user marketing message; it's meant to help guide the project itself (as well as potential collaborators and contributors). Separately, we want to have stronger distinct marketing around Fedora Workstation, Fedora Atomic, Fedora Server — and all the various Spins. Many of these *do* have a direct end-user focus. We've seen a marked increase in various metrics since we started this organizational and marketing split with Fedora.next, and we want to build on that.
Posted Apr 17, 2017 18:19 UTC (Mon)
by Conan_Kudo (subscriber, #103240)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Apr 17, 2017 21:44 UTC (Mon)
by mattdm (subscriber, #18)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Apr 17, 2017 22:08 UTC (Mon)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link] (1 responses)
1) You are not mentioning free and open source software and people are worried that it implies that the project isn't going to focus on that
Posted Apr 24, 2017 15:29 UTC (Mon)
by mattdm (subscriber, #18)
[Link]
I understand the worry, but I think it's mostly because I took it for granted and didn't emphasize it in this message. The intention is for the core values, including Freedom, to be emphasized along with the mission statement.
> 2) Desktop/laptop users are feeling left out
That's okay. This isn't a marketing message for users. Desktop/laptop users will continue to be an important base served through Fedora Workstation and the desktop spins.
Posted Apr 18, 2017 14:37 UTC (Tue)
by csamuel (✭ supporter ✭, #2624)
[Link]
# * What do we do?
When desktop/laptop users (etc) are ommitted then you are saying that they are not part of what you are doing, or your target audience.
Now that might not be what you *mean* to be saying, but sadly it is (IMHO) what you are actually saying.
All the best,
Posted Apr 18, 2017 10:29 UTC (Tue)
by BeS (guest, #43108)
[Link] (1 responses)
For my taste that's to specific. Already one year from now there might be another "cool" and important technology and another year later nobody (or significant less people) will care about one of the three you mention here.
Why not something more technology neutral and long lasting like: "Fedora creates an innovative platform for general purpose computers and servers..."
Posted Apr 27, 2017 4:46 UTC (Thu)
by Garak (guest, #99377)
[Link]
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
> are here to collaborate to create solutions for specific user
> problems, ranging from Fedora Workstation to Fedora Robotics
> Suite. We have lots of ways to do this within the project, from
> Editions to Spins and Labs to the upcoming Fedora Playground
> concept. The core emphasis, though, is on enabling this
> collaboration.
The thing is, when you're making a change like this, everything matters to everyone. And messages as simple as the mission statement need to be necessarily broad to cover everything Fedora as a project does and will do. It's a bad idea to write something like that in a way that makes what the vast majority of people care about feel like their work is not important anymore.
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
2) Desktop/laptop users are feeling left out
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The new Fedora Project mission statement
#
# * Who do we do it for?
Chris
The new Fedora Project mission statement
The answer is simple- people are scared of what terrorists and pedophiles can do with General Purpose Computers and Servers and the Internet. As importantly, so are establishment businesses whose product's functionality can be subsumed by those things. If you want to get nostalgic, read about General Purpose technologies in FCC-10-201 (U.S. net neutrality circa 2010). Then compare the language to whatever lauded internet policy comes out of the current and future administrations. And contrast with what is really going on for industry and individual users. Google and Amazon and a few others are the gatekeepers. The sad truth is that the democratic majority wants gatekeepers and censors... at the same time they want to hear about how much freedom from gatekeepers and censorship their policies provide. Contradictory? sure. Avoidable or changeable? I'm not so sure anymore.General Purpose Computers as Servers Scare People
http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7522219498