Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Posted Jan 16, 2017 14:25 UTC (Mon) by Seegras (guest, #20463)Parent article: Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Posted Jan 16, 2017 15:10 UTC (Mon)
by anselm (subscriber, #2796)
[Link] (5 responses)
PulseAudio is pretty critical if you want stuff like an intermittently connected Bluetooth headset, webcam microphone, or TV set with HDMI audio to work out of the box. It can manage these conveniently and do things like hand off audio streams from one of those devices to another in mid-play.
Many people think that that sort of thing ought to work on a desktop system, but if your audio setup is quite static and you are never confronted with the issue in the first place, you can probably get away without PulseAudio.
Posted Jan 19, 2017 13:42 UTC (Thu)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (4 responses)
My system doesn't have PulseAudio - I gather that would give us far more control over what happens.
Cheers,
Posted Jan 19, 2017 15:12 UTC (Thu)
by cortana (subscriber, #24596)
[Link]
Posted Jan 19, 2017 15:41 UTC (Thu)
by zlynx (guest, #2285)
[Link] (2 responses)
With some development effort you could fix that. PulseAudio for example, has a system daemon mode. Disable the per-user pulse daemon, use the system level one, fix the socket access permissions, etc, and you could play audio from all users at once.
Posted Jan 24, 2017 19:25 UTC (Tue)
by ajmacleod (guest, #1729)
[Link] (1 responses)
In the end I wiped every vestige of PA from my system; at least single-user sound worked much more efficiently and I was happy to be rid of another layer of useless bloat.
By way of comparison, JACK was comparatively simple to get working and did exactly what it promised.
Posted Jan 25, 2017 9:00 UTC (Wed)
by anselm (subscriber, #2796)
[Link]
Yes, but JACK and PulseAudio cater to completely different use cases, and therefore comparing the two is essentially comparing a fairly simple apple to a pretty complicated orange. The oft-reviled Lennart Poettering explains this in more detail.
Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Wol
Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
Maintainers for desktop "critical infrastructure"
By way of comparison, JACK was comparatively simple to get working and did exactly what it promised.