A discussion on stable kernel workflow issues

Posted Nov 2, 2016 0:05 UTC (Wed) by jake (editor, #205)
In reply to: A discussion on stable kernel workflow issues by spender
Parent article: A discussion on stable kernel workflow issues

> For whatever reason (I guess we would have to be present at the kernel summit to know)
> they decided to revert both patches and leave the infoleak there for 4.4.30 instead.

I think the answer you seek is in the article you are commenting on, Brad.

jake

A discussion on stable kernel workflow issues

Posted Nov 2, 2016 0:15 UTC (Wed) by spender (guest, #23067) [Link]

Unless the answer is dogmatic adherence to a new policy of reverting things that are fixed perfectly well, it's not.

-Brad