Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com)
Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com)
Posted Oct 22, 2016 11:09 UTC (Sat) by Wol (subscriber, #4433)In reply to: Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com) by zvyagintsev
Parent article: Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com)
If this is run with a tight controlling group, who say "this is the way it is" but are prepared for all the code and decisions to be open (as in full view, not as in anybody can join in), then I think it could well be a goer.
I wish it well.
Cheers,
Wol
Posted Oct 22, 2016 17:45 UTC (Sat)
by geek (guest, #45074)
[Link] (3 responses)
indeed! What could go wrnog?
Posted Oct 22, 2016 23:16 UTC (Sat)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (2 responses)
But if it's all Open Source, then if stuff does go wrong, just fork it ... :-)
If there's NOT a BDFL, as others have pointed out, there's an awful lot else that could go wrong instead ...
Cheers,
Posted Oct 22, 2016 23:49 UTC (Sat)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Oct 23, 2016 7:49 UTC (Sun)
by BlueLightning (subscriber, #38978)
[Link]
Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com)
Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com)
Wol
Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com)
LOL.
Ranking the Web With Radical Transparency (Linux.com)
