What's next for Apache OpenOffice

Posted Sep 9, 2016 0:26 UTC (Fri) by simosx (guest, #24338)
In reply to: What's next for Apache OpenOffice by jimjag
Parent article: What's next for Apache OpenOffice

>>No it can't be.

> That seem pretty presumptuous of you.

The discussions on the dev mailing list of AOO do not look promising.

What's next for Apache OpenOffice

Posted Sep 9, 2016 12:13 UTC (Fri) by jimjag (guest, #84477) [Link] (2 responses)

>The discussions on the dev mailing list of AOO do not look promising.

I would suggest that that is your opinion. I would also suggest that more objective people would say the exact opposite.

What's next for Apache OpenOffice

Posted Sep 13, 2016 12:21 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (1 responses)

There seem to be terribly few 'objective' people around. In fact the only people I know of who have been 'objective' by this standard for lo these many years are people with stakes in AOO not failing. There's a word for that, and it's not 'objective'.

What's next for Apache OpenOffice

Posted Sep 14, 2016 13:27 UTC (Wed) by andy@barnes.net (guest, #5890) [Link]

Well LO managed to do it. AOO could save themselves some time by forking the current LO as their starting point ;)

I know, I trolled.