Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve?
From: | Patricia Shanahan <pats-AT-acm.org> | |
To: | dev-AT-openoffice.apache.org | |
Subject: | Re: What would OpenOffice NON-retirement involve? | |
Date: | Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:25:39 -0700 | |
Message-ID: | <8c9692ee-570c-8271-c990-4665e1e8280b@acm.org> |
On 9/2/2016 7:59 AM, Phillip Rhodes wrote: > OK, counter-point to the other thread... let's talk specifically about what > needs to happen next, given that some (plenty|most|all|???) of us want this > project to > continue moving forward. > > What has to happen next? What is the most important thing/things we could > be > working on? What could I do *right now* to help move things in a positive > direction? > > How can we attract more developers? How do we counter the FUD that is > already being promulgated in response to the "retirement" discussion? > etc... The "other thread" is actually liberating. Let's go public with the risk that AOO will be shut down, despite the wishes and best efforts of its remaining developers. I would like to see every possible medium used to present one message: "AOO is at serious risk of dying, unless we get more volunteer developers, especially C++ programmers." I know we need other skills as well, but I don't want to dilute or complicate that message. I would like a special mailing list recruitment@openoffice.apache.org, just for signing up and organizing new developers. No need for them to start with dev@, especially the less experienced developers. Just send an e-mail to recruitment@ The message should go out every way it can: users@openoffice.apache.org OpenOffice forums Press release members@apache.org dev@community.apache.org We should also strengthen the current download page appeal for developers to state the risk of shut down.