State of the Kernel Self Protection Project
State of the Kernel Self Protection Project
Posted Sep 5, 2016 19:15 UTC (Mon) by PaXTeam (guest, #24616)In reply to: State of the Kernel Self Protection Project by mina86
Parent article: State of the Kernel Self Protection Project
Posted Sep 5, 2016 21:11 UTC (Mon)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (2 responses)
This is sounding less and less high-minded by the minute.
Posted Sep 5, 2016 21:15 UTC (Mon)
by PaXTeam (guest, #24616)
[Link]
Posted Sep 6, 2016 10:13 UTC (Tue)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link]
E.g., every seems to be agreed PaX et al have done some good work on security. Wouldn't it be nice if some of the money going into hardening the kernel helped that work?
The question is whether the inter-personal issues at play can be overcome to make that possible. Whether PaX et al can co-operate, tackle the nits and implement review comments (which sometimes do no more than help give the reviewers a shared sense of participation and value - but we socio-insensitive techies often don't perceive the soft, socio-politics, sigh), etc. Whether the other side(s) could get over their hostility, etc. ?
Shame really for everyone, inc. the users.
State of the Kernel Self Protection Project
State of the Kernel Self Protection Project
State of the Kernel Self Protection Project