|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Pylint 1.6.0 released

From:  Claudiu Popa <pcmanticore-AT-gmail.com>
To:  "code-quality-AT-python.org" <code-quality-AT-python.org>, python-announce-list-AT-python.org, python-list-AT-python.org
Subject:  Pylint 1.6.0 released
Date:  Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:55:20 +0100
Message-ID:  <CAMy=CLrN9RL6bOgvLQTFzPmf95Ed0aEcEoPmYZf1J9ek3QF6zA@mail.gmail.com>
Archive‑link:  Article

Hi folks,





I am joyful to announce the release of Pylint 1.6.0.

This is the next minor release in the 1.X branch and

most probably the last one, since we are preparing

the taking off of Pylint 2.0.



This release has a couple of small improvements,

bug fixes and new checks, comparing to the last one.

You can find more about was changed in this release here:



https://docs.pylint.org/en/1.6.0/whatsnew/1.6.html

https://docs.pylint.org/en/1.6.0/whatsnew/changelog.html#...


As usual, don't hesitate to report any new bugs you

might encounter with this release. We are also

looking for new contributors, so if you feel like

taking a stab at a bug or a feature you would like

in pylint, open up an issue and let's talk!

We are also planning to do releases more often from

now on and you can see what we are planning for the

next releases here: https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/milestones





Thank you and enjoy,

Claudiu Popa

-- 

https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-announce-...


        Support the Python Software Foundation:

        http://www.python.org/psf/donations/






to post comments

Pylint 1.6.0 released

Posted Jul 16, 2016 14:53 UTC (Sat) by robert_s (subscriber, #42402) [Link] (2 responses)

I'm quite a fan of using .keys() because it's far more "literate" than just iterating through the dict. In fact, most places I see a dict being directly iterated through it is in fact a bug, the author having forgotten to use .items() or .values().

Pylint 1.6.0 released

Posted Jul 16, 2016 15:28 UTC (Sat) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389) [Link] (1 responses)

Having done a bit of Haskell and Rust, iterating over a dictionary to get the pairs is much more useful in my experience. The Python default iteration over a dictionary is odd to me…

Pylint 1.6.0 released

Posted Jul 16, 2016 19:36 UTC (Sat) by jwilk (subscriber, #63328) [Link]

Yes, it is a bit odd; but it's also consistent with how the "in" operator works on dicts. That said, discrepancy between "in" and iterating wouldn't be unprecedented:
>>> s = 'foo'; x = 'oo'
>>> x in s
True
>>> x in iter(s)
False


Copyright © 2016, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds