Transport-level protocols in user space
Transport-level protocols in user space
Posted Jun 30, 2016 5:37 UTC (Thu) by marcH (subscriber, #57642)In reply to: Transport-level protocols in user space by marcH
Parent article: Transport-level protocols in user space
> Bug reports from Joe Random getting ignored: what's new?
Example: one of the many, spot reports of bufferbloat. A very simple one. Reported in 2004, more than 5 years before Jim Gettys thoroughly studied bufferbloat and gave it a catchy name. According to https://lwn.net/Articles/617070/, this had been ignored until 2014.
I find nothing wrong with ignoring bug reports from nobodies; the reputation system serves a useful filtering purpose and this is the way it's supposed to work. Everything is fine... as long as no one pretends that all reports get looked at.
> TOU-related bug reports from Facebook, Amazon or Google coming with tentative fix attached? I bet they will be looked at.
Posted Jun 30, 2016 13:33 UTC (Thu)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (5 responses)
3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP group default qlen 1000
Fedora 24. qdisc + 1k qlen.
:( :( :(
(And yeah, I've raised bugs in the past, given suggested scripts for NM to set lower qlen - rejected).
Posted Jul 5, 2016 9:39 UTC (Tue)
by Lennie (subscriber, #49641)
[Link] (4 responses)
"Going back to what Marc said in an earlier e-mail about having txqueuelen in the unit of bytes rather than packets to provide a fixed queueing delay in ms rather than packets. Maintaining txqueuelen in ms would be an ideal solution, but probably hard to achieve in practice."
That is actually what CoDel does, drop some packets when the length of the queue measured _in time_ becomes to long (simplification).
Posted Jul 5, 2016 9:48 UTC (Tue)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (3 responses)
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
But wlan still seems stuck on qdisc and a massive qlen. :(
Posted Jul 17, 2016 11:45 UTC (Sun)
by mtaht (subscriber, #11087)
[Link] (2 responses)
but we are making serious progress, now on two chipsets.
http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/fq_codel_on_ath10k/
https://blog.tohojo.dk/2016/06/fixing-the-wifi-performanc...
Coming soon to a kernel tree near you, I hope.
Posted Jul 17, 2016 14:57 UTC (Sun)
by Lennie (subscriber, #49641)
[Link]
Posted Jul 17, 2016 21:32 UTC (Sun)
by flussence (guest, #85566)
[Link]
Transport-level protocols in user space
Transport-level protocols in user space
Transport-level protocols in user space
Transport-level protocols in user space
Transport-level protocols in user space
Transport-level protocols in user space