|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Please don't shaft scientific computing users!

Please don't shaft scientific computing users!

Posted Jun 10, 2016 19:30 UTC (Fri) by flussence (guest, #85566)
In reply to: Please don't shaft scientific computing users! by pizza
Parent article: Distributors ponder a systemd change

Most Linux desktops are now in the unenviable position of lacking all three of those qualities, and more.


to post comments

Please don't shaft scientific computing users!

Posted Jun 10, 2016 20:51 UTC (Fri) by pizza (subscriber, #46) [Link] (2 responses)

> Most Linux desktops are now in the unenviable position of lacking all three of those qualities, and more.

Oh? By any quantifiable quality, things are better now than they've ever been.

As for touchy-feely stuff like "respecting UNIX conventions". Twenty years ago in my academic days, I was taught that the overriding principle for UNIX was the simplicity of implementation. That was prioritized over everything else, including correctness, performance, and ease-of-use (for both developers and end-users)

Oh, for sake of discussion, I'll refer to this list:

http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?UnixDesignPhilosophy

I'll note that even UNIXen at the time that list was published didn't really adhere to UNIX conventions all that well. As does the entire notion of GUIs.

Please don't shaft scientific computing users!

Posted Jun 11, 2016 21:25 UTC (Sat) by flussence (guest, #85566) [Link]

I know it was worded the way it was but I'm not entirely stuck on the idea removing those is bad. Some of the awful acts committed in the mid-00s in the name of “shiny” are best left forgotten (and some forms of “just works” too; nobody'll miss ndiswrapper!)

Unix (the abstract ideal people usually talk about) shouldn't be confused with UNIX (sometimes spelled with an ®). I think most here would see ignoring the latter's conventions as a feature, on the other hand I agree with and often design systems according to that list. There are even a few points in there I didn't know about, but was doing anyway...

Please don't shaft scientific computing users!

Posted Jun 13, 2016 13:17 UTC (Mon) by paulj (subscriber, #341) [Link]

So much better that I switched back to WindowMaker (running under mate-session) the other year. Cause session-management works - least for the stuff I care more about like non-GNOME/gtk apps, older apps, xterms, etc. and - for all its flaws - it at least isn't heave everything up and over on me every 6 months.

If I really wanted to shake up my desktop, I'd probably just go for Android as my desktop, and use some rootless Xserver for whatever older apps I needed. I'd have tried that already, but I can't just 'yum install android-desktop' on my Fedora desktop and laptop.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds