Distributors ponder a systemd change
Distributors ponder a systemd change
Posted Jun 9, 2016 22:20 UTC (Thu) by johannbg (guest, #65743)In reply to: Distributors ponder a systemd change by viro
Parent article: Distributors ponder a systemd change
Posted Jun 10, 2016 0:23 UTC (Fri)
by viro (subscriber, #7872)
[Link]
a) left the project (fedora, I take it?) != lost all ability to contact systemd developers. Their list isn't closed, AFAIK.
b) whether you've failed to inform them about screen(1) breaking in such situation back then or not, they certainly could've looked themselves. Searching for bug reports mentioning that setting is not a rocket science.
c) I've no comment on the state of Fedora (before or after systemd transition - it's not something I use other than for testing and that only when I can't reproduce a bug on something saner; I sure as hell do not watch the politcs in it), and your choice of standards is up to you, but that amount of drama got to be counterproductive whatever those standards might be. I really, honestly have no fucking idea how you've parted ways with that project; judging by your postings years later it had to have been messy as hell and at a guess hadn't been any calmer than said postings (BTW, as an aside - what the hell _is_ in phoenix? You keep refering to it, and by the context it sounds like a center of some Evil Corporate Cabal(tm), presumably RH-related one. I'm fairly sure that RH headquarters are still in Raleigh and AFAIK there's no office in Phoenix - AZ or otherwise...)
Distributors ponder a systemd change