Distributors ponder a systemd change
Distributors ponder a systemd change
Posted Jun 8, 2016 18:13 UTC (Wed) by cyperpunks (subscriber, #39406)Parent article: Distributors ponder a systemd change
$ at -m -f run.sh now
will systemd changes destroy such usage? 
      Posted Jun 8, 2016 19:37 UTC (Wed)
                               by dtlin (subscriber, #36537)
                              [Link] 
       
     
    
      I don't even have at, both in my personal Arch Linux and the CentOS 7 I use for work.Distributors ponder a systemd change
      
But as long as atd is running, it should be fine. Looks like upstream has a systemd service file for atd too.
      
          
 
           