|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

The perils of federated protocols

The perils of federated protocols

Posted May 26, 2016 5:58 UTC (Thu) by madhatter (subscriber, #4665)
In reply to: The perils of federated protocols by Cyberax
Parent article: The perils of federated protocols

> Clients _can_ remove support for _some_ bad fallbacks, after years of gradual deployment. Servers are usually stuck pretty
> much for a decade (e.g.: SSLv3 deprecation).

# rcsdiff -r1.45 /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
1113a1114
> SSLProtocol All -SSLv2 -SSLv3

I'd have the check my daybook to be sure, but my memory is that it took me less than a decade to type and commit the above change.


to post comments

The perils of federated protocols

Posted May 26, 2016 6:02 UTC (Thu) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523) [Link] (1 responses)

> I'd have the check my daybook to be sure, but my memory is that it took me less than a decade to type and commit the above change.
Duh. You probably don't have an expensive middlebox in front of your server doing load balancing.

The perils of federated protocols

Posted May 26, 2016 6:35 UTC (Thu) by madhatter (subscriber, #4665) [Link]

I agree that code that's baked into firmware (especially on platforms that are infrequently upgraded by the manufacturer) is much harder to upgrade than code that's deployed in software, but that's equally true on client (eg, think weird android-esque tablets) as on server platforms. That's a pretty good argument for using general-purpose computing platforms for as much as possible, but I'm not sure it argues specifically against servers.

The perils of federated protocols

Posted May 26, 2016 8:18 UTC (Thu) by chojrak11 (guest, #52056) [Link] (1 responses)

> my memory is that it took me less than a decade to type and commit the above change.
Said last person in the world still using RCS routinely...

The perils of federated protocols

Posted May 26, 2016 8:24 UTC (Thu) by madhatter (subscriber, #4665) [Link]

We could certainly have a discussion about the pros and cons of localised-lightweight vs centralised-heavyweight source control, and it might even be interesting, but here is probably not the right place to do it. If you think that my choice of source-control applications has any bearing on my underlying argument, please feel free to argue your case. Do, however, bear in mind Pirsig's dictum that "the world's biggest fool can say the sun is shining, but that doesn't make it dark out".


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds