The perils of federated protocols
The perils of federated protocols
Posted May 26, 2016 5:58 UTC (Thu) by madhatter (subscriber, #4665)In reply to: The perils of federated protocols by Cyberax
Parent article: The perils of federated protocols
> much for a decade (e.g.: SSLv3 deprecation).
# rcsdiff -r1.45 /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
1113a1114
> SSLProtocol All -SSLv2 -SSLv3
I'd have the check my daybook to be sure, but my memory is that it took me less than a decade to type and commit the above change.
Posted May 26, 2016 6:02 UTC (Thu)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 26, 2016 6:35 UTC (Thu)
by madhatter (subscriber, #4665)
[Link]
Posted May 26, 2016 8:18 UTC (Thu)
by chojrak11 (guest, #52056)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 26, 2016 8:24 UTC (Thu)
by madhatter (subscriber, #4665)
[Link]
The perils of federated protocols
Duh. You probably don't have an expensive middlebox in front of your server doing load balancing.
The perils of federated protocols
The perils of federated protocols
Said last person in the world still using RCS routinely...
We could certainly have a discussion about the pros and cons of localised-lightweight vs centralised-heavyweight source control, and it might even be interesting, but here is probably not the right place to do it. If you think that my choice of source-control applications has any bearing on my underlying argument, please feel free to argue your case. Do, however, bear in mind Pirsig's dictum that "the world's biggest fool can say the sun is shining, but that doesn't make it dark out".
The perils of federated protocols