alternatives exist
alternatives exist
Posted Apr 26, 2016 10:47 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: alternatives exist by johannbg
Parent article: Moglen: How Should the Free Software Movement View the Linux Foundation?
Posted Apr 27, 2016 11:08 UTC (Wed)
by nye (subscriber, #51576)
[Link] (3 responses)
Well how may ethernet ports do you need, and what's the threshold for 'too expensive'? I'm guessing something like £150+VAT is probably over it:
Otherwise maybe a mini-itx board with 2 ethernet ports and a PCI-E slot to add more would be the way forward, like this:
Posted May 10, 2016 21:16 UTC (Tue)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted May 10, 2016 21:32 UTC (Tue)
by TomH (subscriber, #56149)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 11, 2016 22:25 UTC (Wed)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
Posted Apr 27, 2016 21:36 UTC (Wed)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (11 responses)
Posted Apr 27, 2016 22:23 UTC (Wed)
by johannbg (guest, #65743)
[Link] (2 responses)
The hex [2] is also fanless ( and cheaper ).
Perhaps LWN writers should just buy one of these devices and do a review on the routerOS that comes with it which should enlighten most individuals that you better of ( time and price wize ) just buying one of those device with routerOS and it's subscriptions rather than wasting your time and effort trying to hack some remotely function network device out of RPI, Odroid or the likes.
1. http://routerboard.com/RB450G ( $59.95 )
Posted Apr 27, 2016 22:40 UTC (Wed)
by johannbg (guest, #65743)
[Link]
Here is an $18 enclosure for the RB450G.
1. http://www.ispsupplies.com/categories/Indoor-Enclosures/M...
Posted Apr 27, 2016 22:42 UTC (Wed)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
I have several RBs running regular vanilla Debian for MIPS and I've had no problems at all with it. Recovering from a bad installation is also easy, the board's bootloader has built-in netboot support and is accessible through UART, so you just need to set up a DHCP+TFTP to serve recovery image and select it during the boot.
It's pretty much the best router-type device I've ever worked with. Head and shoulders ahead of ARM-based crapware home routers.
Posted Apr 27, 2016 23:33 UTC (Wed)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (7 responses)
There was someone working on doing this, but the work was being done under an NDA where he wasn't allowed to release the result and the company then got sticky about even renewing the NDA, let alone allowing the release of the result.
they got a bit of money from me, and burned me by their change in stance, so I'm not getting more of their stuff until they actually release stuff.
Since routerOS is linux based, they really should be doing so. And they really should update it (the last I read it was based on the 2.6 kernel)
Posted Apr 28, 2016 0:29 UTC (Thu)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
There are HOWTOs about running Debian on RBs, they are somewhat dated but still working.
There's also full OpenWRT support.
Posted Apr 28, 2016 0:45 UTC (Thu)
by johannbg (guest, #65743)
[Link] (5 responses)
There are continues updates of the routerOS and these days it's based on the Linux 3.3.5 kernel.
The source code for it is available on request but I must say I have never tested requesting it from them ( or anyone else for that matter ) so I can't say how "functional" that process is from them but indeed it should be open but I guess they are one of those vendors that think they are doing something very special in their proprietary environment which other vendors are not doing when in fact in a nutshell they are all doing the same thing.
Posted Apr 28, 2016 1:31 UTC (Thu)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (4 responses)
Their "What is RouterOS" pdf still claims that it's linux 2.6 based. I don't know if I'm glad that the document is so out of date or not :-)
The Openwrt table of hardware page isn't encouraging ( https://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/mikrotik/crs125g ) but it wouldn't be the first time a page didn't get updated after things got working.
Posted Apr 28, 2016 9:41 UTC (Thu)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Apr 28, 2016 15:26 UTC (Thu)
by johannbg (guest, #65743)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Apr 28, 2016 16:34 UTC (Thu)
by johannbg (guest, #65743)
[Link]
Once that date has passed only products intended for future retail sale will remain available [1].
Note this is completely open project on a completely open hardware ( as it can be ) and people will be able to replace the turris openwrt with their own distribution if they so much want ( which alot of people will do including myself ) in fact the cz.nic guys already have given Andreas Färber ( suse/arm ) one of their prototype to experiment with to do just that and Andreas has already gotten opensuse running on it and shared the instruction how he did so with the opensuse community here [4] ( which should be enough to get other distribution and people started ).
Here are some couple of other links readers might find useful [3][4].
Posted Apr 28, 2016 17:48 UTC (Thu)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
I do a bit more than just playing with it for fun. I run the wireless network at the Scale conference, this year I deployed about 120 APs around the convention center.
alternatives exist
http://www.mini-itx.com/store/~FX5624 (bizarre that only two of the ports are gigabit, though in many scenarios that wouldn't be a showstopper)
http://www.mini-itx.com/store/~JNF9HG-2930
http://www.mini-itx.com/store/~N3050N-D3H
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
2. http://routerboard.com/RB750Gr2 ( $99.00 )
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
alternatives exist
1. http://en.blog.nic.cz/2016/04/27/turris-omnia-campaign-en...
2. https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-arm/2016-03/msg00136....
3. https://github.com/CZ-NIC
4. https://www.turris.cz/en/
alternatives exist