Zemlin on the Linux Foundation's by-law changes

Posted Jan 22, 2016 19:58 UTC (Fri) by chirlu (guest, #89906)
Parent article: Zemlin on the Linux Foundation's by-law changes

I would have expected to read a statement that the timing of these bylaw changes was conincidental and not prompted by one particular person declaring candidacy; but there is no such statement.

Zemlin on the Linux Foundation's by-law changes

Posted Jan 23, 2016 16:07 UTC (Sat) by jospoortvliet (guest, #33164) [Link] (2 responses)

No, he dodges that question very well, focusing instead on the 2-3 idiotic trolls who have been trying to poison the debate with some irrelevant anti-feminism nonsense.

Zemlin on the Linux Foundation's by-law changes

Posted Jan 24, 2016 16:07 UTC (Sun) by zuki (subscriber, #41808) [Link]

I don't think it was done "very well". It seems rather ham-fisted, great majority of comments is "Huh? This doesn't answer the question about individual membership voting rights at all". And the opening sentence about being locked away with no internet in China is rather inane.

Zemlin on the Linux Foundation's by-law changes

Posted Jan 27, 2016 0:23 UTC (Wed) by trenton (guest, #106520) [Link]

> poison the debate with some irrelevant

I agree that it is /probably/ irrelevant, but I remind you that it was mjg59 who brought up Karen Sandler's name into this case.

> idiotic trolls
> anti-feminism nonsense

It's a pity that you /the community/ weren't so explicit and firm when some other idiotic trolls /using your language/ were poisoning the open source with the feminist nonsense first.