|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Further history of Unix of /usr

Further history of Unix of /usr

Posted Jan 12, 2016 4:32 UTC (Tue) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
In reply to: Further history of Unix of /usr by giraffedata
Parent article: Preparing for a merged /usr in Debian

> I think a system that has all the system executables on a read-only medium, without having the root filesystem on that same medium must be pretty rare.

It's how all of our users run, and that's a pretty large number.


to post comments

Further history of Unix of /usr

Posted Jan 13, 2016 3:55 UTC (Wed) by giraffedata (guest, #1954) [Link] (1 responses)

I think a system that has all the system executables on a read-only medium, without having the root filesystem on that same medium must be pretty rare.
It's how all of our users run, and that's a pretty large number.

Are you talking about a network filesystem? Because "the network" is not a storage medium, so that's confusing.

Further history of Unix of /usr

Posted Jan 13, 2016 4:00 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]

> Are you talking about a network filesystem? Because "the network" is not a storage medium, so that's confusing.

No. /usr is backed by dm-verity, so from the filesystem perspective it's a read-only block device.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds