US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
The DoD is America's largest government agency, and is tasked with protecting the security of its country, which makes its continued reliance on SHA-1 particularly remarkable. Besides the well known security implications, this reliance could already prove problematic amongst the DoD's millions of employees. For instance, Mozilla Firefox 43 began rejecting all new SHA-1 certificates issued since 1 January 2016. When it encountered one of these certificates, the browser displayed an Untrusted Connection error, although this could be overridden. If DoD employees become accustomed to ignoring such errors, it could become much easier to carry out man-in-the-middle attacks against them."
Posted Jan 12, 2016 1:28 UTC (Tue)
by geek (guest, #45074)
[Link]
Posted Jan 12, 2016 2:10 UTC (Tue)
by smoogen (subscriber, #97)
[Link] (5 responses)
I expect that SHA-1 will still be used and running in various systems until 2020 unless a huge IT investment comes down the pipe.
Posted Jan 12, 2016 6:13 UTC (Tue)
by Otus (subscriber, #67685)
[Link]
Firefox has dominated the news for moving first, but Google and Microsoft have agreed to do the same thing. Chrome 48 is meant to do what Firefox did in a couple of weeks. Not sure about Microsoft's schedule.
So it would mean no updated browsers, period, pretty soon. I should hope no one important will try to live on old browsers until 2020.
Posted Jan 12, 2016 7:56 UTC (Tue)
by keeperofdakeys (guest, #82635)
[Link]
Posted Jan 12, 2016 10:40 UTC (Tue)
by epa (subscriber, #39769)
[Link]
Possibly if access to the older systems is over some kind of VPN which provides its own secure network connection, browsers should be configurable to be less fussy about older hash functions and ciphers when using https.
Posted Jan 12, 2016 11:37 UTC (Tue)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link]
If your job is "security" and your system is using "smoke and mirrors" security, then surely upgrading has a very high priority? Sure, an oil-tanker can't turn on a dime, but if you're the Torrey Canyon you shouldn't have gotten in to that situation in the first place! (The wikipedia article isn't that informative, but they knew the ship was going to wreck long before it actually did).
Cheers,
Posted Jan 15, 2016 17:37 UTC (Fri)
by hkario (subscriber, #94864)
[Link]
I would agree with you, if this schedule wasn't announced more than a year in advance.
No supported systems (be it Windows or Linux) have problems with SHA-256. Even Windows XP will handle them fine, if you update it past SP3.
> There are various industrial systems that are PDP-11's on a chip that won't be 'upgraded' for at least another 20 years because a) they cost millions of 1970's dollars to originally build and would take billions of 2020 dollars to replace.
then put an Intel NUC before it running Linux with an instance of stunnel and make it handle crypto from this century
US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
Wol
US military still SHAckled to outdated DoD PKI infrastructure (Netcraft)
