|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload

From:  David Miller <davem-AT-davemloft.net>
To:  alexander.duyck-AT-gmail.com
Subject:  Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] net: Generalize udp based tunnel offload
Date:  Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:03:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID:  <20151205.130313.1952213347830357234.davem@davemloft.net>
Cc:  tom-AT-herbertland.com, hannes-AT-stressinduktion.org, linville-AT-tuxdriver.com, jesse-AT-kernel.org, anjali.singhai-AT-intel.com, netdev-AT-vger.kernel.org, kiran.patil-AT-intel.com
Archive‑link:  Article

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 00:24:55 -0800

> Still, hard blocking this isn't necessarily going to push the
> vendors to change their ways.

Pushing back is different from blocking entirely.

That means I'm going to be very difficult and make a lot of noise
until I see the message has seeped in.

It doesn't mean that I won't allow a means to use existing hardware
offloads.  You'll just have to bear with me, be patient, and survive
my tantrum on this matter.




to post comments


Copyright © 2015, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds