Rich access control lists
Rich access control lists
Posted Oct 28, 2015 10:24 UTC (Wed) by Seegras (guest, #20463)In reply to: Rich access control lists by mathstuf
Parent article: Rich access control lists
The problem is not mounting filesystems and ignoring the permissions the ACLs specify. The problem is having something mount a filesystem containing ACLs and modifying the contents, thereby DESTROYING the ACLs already specified in the filesystem.
You don't mind something ignoring the ACLs, but you don't want it to delete them. ACL-insensitive-but-ACL-preserving ;)
Posted Oct 28, 2015 23:55 UTC (Wed)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link]
Rich access control lists
Right. So why is read-only mounting not allowed?
