Python and crypto-strength random numbers by default
Python and crypto-strength random numbers by default
Posted Sep 19, 2015 5:51 UTC (Sat) by reubenhwk (guest, #75803)Parent article: Python and crypto-strength random numbers by default
Posted Sep 19, 2015 5:54 UTC (Sat)
by reubenhwk (guest, #75803)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Sep 24, 2015 14:29 UTC (Thu)
by dag- (guest, #30207)
[Link] (2 responses)
Yours is an excellent use-case :-)
Posted Oct 2, 2015 8:07 UTC (Fri)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link] (1 responses)
Immutability, good. Side-effects, bad.
Posted Oct 2, 2015 14:47 UTC (Fri)
by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106)
[Link]
> Because of dangling replies.
Well, dag- did say "if there was no reply to it", which would address the problem of dangling replies.
Even without that restriction, a simple "this comment has been retracted by the author" placeholder message with a link to the original text would seem to me to be a reasonable compromise.
Python and crypto-strength random numbers by default
Python and crypto-strength random numbers by default
Python and crypto-strength random numbers by default
Python and crypto-strength random numbers by default