Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Posted Aug 19, 2015 14:03 UTC (Wed) by nye (subscriber, #51576)In reply to: Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much? by keeperofdakeys
Parent article: Schaller: An Open Letter to Apache Foundation and Apache OpenOffice team
(To a person that doesn't use them, a bash prompt and a DOS prompt are indistinguishable.)
Almost everything about it has changed, in some cases in major ways.
The similarity between Word 2007's UI and Word 2010+'s UI is comparable to the similarity between Vi and Vim (or sh 1.0 vs bash 4.3): conceptually it uses most of the same ideas, so at a quick glance it might look like it's almost the same program, but in fact pretty much every aspect has been improved.
I'm not certain that I've ever come across a feature I've used even once that was missing from the ribbon in Word or Excel (I have in Outlook, in one case, but then Outlook was spawned in the pits of hell so it seems unfair to use it as an example), but you can always add your own tabs, or add your own groups into existing tabs, if necessary. When doing this, you can look at a categorised list or available functions, where some of the "categories" are actually pseudo-categories like "commands not in the ribbon". You can also define your keyboard shortcuts here, in case you have a burning desire to map "Paste as Source Formatting" to "ctrl+shift+p", or whatever.
Posted Aug 19, 2015 15:40 UTC (Wed)
by raven667 (subscriber, #5198)
[Link]
With the MS Ribbon, they documented a long research and testing process which brought them to that design, it's hard to take criticism seriously from people who don't have the foggiest idea of how the design was made. I don't even care about MS Office, I just dislike poorly thought out criticism.
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?