Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Posted Aug 18, 2015 7:00 UTC (Tue) by MKesper (subscriber, #38539)In reply to: Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much? by pheldens
Parent article: Schaller: An Open Letter to Apache Foundation and Apache OpenOffice team
At work I have to use MS Office 2010. Every time I use my private LO I wonder how old the interface feels.
As virtually all business users will have converted to ribbon interface by now, your only chance of migration will be offering something similar.
Posted Aug 19, 2015 4:18 UTC (Wed)
by ccchips (subscriber, #3222)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Aug 19, 2015 7:55 UTC (Wed)
by ovitters (guest, #27950)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Aug 20, 2015 16:01 UTC (Thu)
by ceplm (subscriber, #41334)
[Link] (2 responses)
Just saying.
Posted Aug 21, 2015 0:05 UTC (Fri)
by rgmoore (✭ supporter ✭, #75)
[Link] (1 responses)
This isn't necessarily a useful piece of information regarding how well the interface works. There are always hold-outs whenever an interface changes, and the more radical the change the more of them there will be. That resistance speaks more to the immediate cost of learning the new interface than it does to its long-term value.
Posted Aug 21, 2015 9:43 UTC (Fri)
by jonnor (guest, #76768)
[Link]
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?
Doing better than Apache, but is that saying much?