Why Debian returned to FFmpeg
Why Debian returned to FFmpeg
Posted Jul 21, 2015 20:35 UTC (Tue) by flussence (guest, #85566)In reply to: Why Debian returned to FFmpeg by KotH
Parent article: Why Debian returned to FFmpeg
Do you have any citations to back that up? Because I've seen libav doing an order of magnitude more smearing, up to and including sending fraudulent legal threats over the logo, claiming ffmpeg "steals" code, distributing a fake ffmpeg scareware binary, posts like yours, and so on.
Regarding security, libav makes regular appearances on the security updates page on this site - often for ffmpeg CVEs dated 3-4 years ago. The opposite has never occurred.
Posted Jul 29, 2015 13:54 UTC (Wed)
by lu_zero (guest, #72556)
[Link] (3 responses)
Nobody in Libav ever discussed FFmpeg beside me on here
https://blogs.gentoo.org/lu_zero/2015/02/20/demotivation-...
Let alone "smear".
On the other side, at least few of the the new people contributing to Libav got quite interesting emails from Michael Niedermayer and Carl Eugen Hoyos. (I can say few since they did ask me what the hell was it about, I have no way to know if ALL the new contributors got this kind of interesting service).
Posted Jul 30, 2015 18:02 UTC (Thu)
by flussence (guest, #85566)
[Link] (2 responses)
FFmpeg has been professionally silent on public forums. Your side would do well to learn from their example.
Posted Jul 31, 2015 20:46 UTC (Fri)
by lu_zero (guest, #72556)
[Link] (1 responses)
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.devel/17... silent.
Posted Aug 1, 2015 17:56 UTC (Sat)
by flussence (guest, #85566)
[Link]
The point is I don't have to.
Why Debian returned to FFmpeg
Why Debian returned to FFmpeg
Why Debian returned to FFmpeg
Why Debian returned to FFmpeg
