How to win the copyleft fight—without litigation (Opensource.com)
How to win the copyleft fight—without litigation (Opensource.com)
Posted Jul 15, 2015 18:11 UTC (Wed) by jhhaller (guest, #56103)Parent article: How to win the copyleft fight—without litigation (Opensource.com)
Posted Jul 21, 2015 10:25 UTC (Tue)
by nye (subscriber, #51576)
[Link] (3 responses)
I'm not a licensing expert, but I don't think so:
>if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version by providing access to the Corresponding Source from a network server at no charge
So if you've not modified MongoDB, then you wouldn't have any obligation to add the link. I imagine some people would argue that the entire stack built on it would be considered a derivative work and therefore should be AGPL, but I think that would be a hard sell for a pluggable storage backend.
Posted Jul 21, 2015 17:55 UTC (Tue)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Jul 22, 2015 11:16 UTC (Wed)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link]
Posted Jul 23, 2015 14:50 UTC (Thu)
by nye (subscriber, #51576)
[Link]
How to win the copyleft fight—without litigation (Opensource.com)
How to win the copyleft fight—without litigation (Opensource.com)
How to win the copyleft fight—without litigation (Opensource.com)
How to win the copyleft fight—without litigation (Opensource.com)