|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Microservices 101: The good, the bad and the ugly (ZDNet)

Microservices 101: The good, the bad and the ugly (ZDNet)

Posted Jul 14, 2015 14:43 UTC (Tue) by drag (guest, #31333)
In reply to: Microservices 101: The good, the bad and the ugly (ZDNet) by torquay
Parent article: Microservices 101: The good, the bad and the ugly (ZDNet)

> Or is there already a containerized version of firefox?

There is, but it's not going to be easily usable in a manner that is suitable for a workstation or desktop. People are working on sandboxing/containerizing desktop applications, but desktop requirements are always significantly higher then individual servers.

> erm? Atomic is for running Docker containers. I'm referring to user-facing stuff like evince, firefox, libreoffice, gimp, etc.

What on earth does it have to do with 'Microservices'? Regardless, the atomic hosts are very stripped down. You are not going to have to worry about firefox vulnerabilities.


to post comments

Microservices 101: The good, the bad and the ugly (ZDNet)

Posted Jul 14, 2015 15:06 UTC (Tue) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds