This model of containerization is a grand error

Posted Jun 18, 2015 18:07 UTC (Thu) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
In reply to: This model of containerization is a grand error by peter-b
Parent article: Systemd and containers

It's a shibboleth to mark anti-Lennart fanbois.

This model of containerization is a grand error

Posted Jun 19, 2015 0:59 UTC (Fri) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198) [Link] (4 responses)

You are right, its a dog whistle to make your feelings clear to like minded people and the practice of giving nicknames can be a way to assert dominance over someone by controlling something so fundamental as the persons name.

This model of containerization is a grand error

Posted Jun 19, 2015 8:52 UTC (Fri) by anselm (subscriber, #2796) [Link] (2 responses)

I think that in order to “assert dominance” over Lennart Poettering you would have to do a bit more than mis-spell his name.

This model of containerization is a grand error

Posted Jun 19, 2015 17:13 UTC (Fri) by raven667 (subscriber, #5198) [Link] (1 responses)

It usually isn't effective in creating submissiveness on the person its being said to, it's more about the ego of the person doing the saying, demonstrating that what they say is under their own control and they can be rude with little consequence. That is something which can puff up a weak ego, if only slightly.

This model of containerization is a grand error

Posted Jul 4, 2015 14:48 UTC (Sat) by ksandstr (guest, #60862) [Link]

How about instead of this generally passive-aggressive mumbling, you say how you really feel? You could even go as far as to refute my points directly.

Failing that, you could niggle at my insubtle hypothesis that eventually Pöttering will full-bodily enter his own fundament and thereby vanish. Or you could take issue with the hyperbole referencing Brave New World, a book concerning dystopian conformity; or the company store, a symbol of dire working-class exploitation in pre-New Deal America. Certainly there are individual phrases or words that could similarly serve as points of deflection, such as the millennia-old "foo must be destroyed" statement of creed[0], or my framing the putative motives of systemd "fanbois"[1] as motivated by fashions (i.e. positive peer pressure) alone.

That's assuming that the capacity for such refutation and/or secondary niggling beyond a variant spelling exists, that is.

Until then, I wish you a good day.

[0] entirely pre-empting the "dog whistle" shibboleth argument, in case this went by under the radar
[1] that's class right thur

This model of containerization is a grand error

Posted Jun 21, 2015 11:22 UTC (Sun) by misc (subscriber, #73730) [Link]

I agree with your point, I would go as far as saying that it can extend to more than persons ( example, a company in Seattle ).
Or do we just personify the said companies and therefore treat then as people, still not sure on that one.