PostgreSQL: the good, the bad, and the ugly
PostgreSQL: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Posted May 25, 2015 16:37 UTC (Mon) by tomik (guest, #93004)In reply to: PostgreSQL: the good, the bad, and the ugly by dvdeug
Parent article: PostgreSQL: the good, the bad, and the ugly
How is that worse than having the same syntax, but doing something different? If the behaviour is different, there's no way in keeping compatibility at the SQL level. IMSNHO it's exactly the opposite - it's way better to visibly break the application, than to accept the SQL and do something subtly different.