The kdbuswreck
The kdbuswreck
Posted Apr 29, 2015 16:35 UTC (Wed) by Uraeus (guest, #33755)In reply to: The kdbuswreck by paulj
Parent article: The kdbuswreck
If that is your takeaway from this article I think you probably suffer from confirmation bias :)
Posted Apr 29, 2015 16:57 UTC (Wed)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link]
To be honest, I'd prefer if this was done with something more generic, i.e. multi-listener AF_UNIX-like and whatever new SCM_CRED stuff needed to support authentication, so that it could benefit now just DBus but also whichever IPC system ends up replacing DBus.
Attaching and exposing kernel capabilities to sockets by default in a new API definitely sounds scarey!
The kdbuswreck
Quite possible. ;)